3TB HDD formatted as NTFS for main files. Phoronix: Linux 5. Per the recommendation from RedHat: Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. 如果您追求高度的数据完整性和强大的快照功能，Btrfs可能是更好的选择。. September 18, 2023 Miscellaneous 9 mins read This article will look at the difference between the Btrfs vs. Ext4 Filesystem 其實你提到一個重點了. This includes workload that creates or deletes large numbers of small files in a single thread. sorry, i got that second sentence wrong. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. Generally, would go with btrfs. It self-describes as "stable", as of. A Red Hat training course is available for RHEL 8. 4 EXT4 / XFS / Btrfs RAID Performance On Four HDDs Storage : 2019-12-28: Benchmarking The Experimental Bcachefs File-System Against Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS & ZFS Storage : 2019-06-25: Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: Linux 5. g. Is XFS better than btrfs? September 30, 2023 by Garry. It also recovers from power failure easily, with the journaling system. In the past, I have often seen statements that EXT4 is better for gaming than XFS. 2. Out of curiosity I have tried BTRFS (still unstable so I can't really expect to be able to use it) and noticed that the read speed is about 150% of ext4 - while write speed is comparable. a lot of btrfs' perception of 'breaking' is actually due to checksums (correctly) finding fault on a users data and (correctly) not allowing mounting of the filesystem until it's fixed. Btrfs is the recommended file system to use in most scenarios. This pre-dates xfsprogs 3. Both filesystems provide COW but XFS fragments less (and it's data cow only so no snapshots, only reflinks). A Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe 4. ago. It has features that can scale better than ext4 and is even preferred over ZFS by some users. Btrfs supports RAID 0, 1, 10, 5, and 6, while ZFS supports various RAID-Z levels (RAID-Z, RAID-Z2, and RAID-Z3). ) TL, DR: All 3 major next gen CoW file systems have their advantages and drawbacks, and I figure integrating them into my workflow is the only way to fairly evaluate them see how they work for myself. Ext4 has journaling on by default, and new users likely won’t know how to disable it to save read/writes on their SSDs. So if you have a SSD and care about the wear of that then. But according to tests in all scenarios, XFS is better than EXT4, it's a pity that there are no tests in games. Even if you do notice. The Btrfs partition scheme preset creates an ext4 /boot, and a Btrfs pool. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4,btrfs is also slower in some benchmarks but I very much doubt thats visible in normal use. The BTRFS RAID is not difficult at all to create or problematic, but up until now, OMV does not support BTRFS RAID creation or management through the webGUI, so you have to use the terminal. After conversion I: enabled compression. The XFS supports more file sizes and greater file or partition sizes. No ext4, você pode ativar cotas ao criar o sistema de arquivo ou mais tarde em um sistema de arquivo existente. Ext4 has some scalability and performance issues when dealing with large or fragmented files or directories. You can hot swap drives without rebooting, remove failed drives, swap in a larger drive and remove the smaller one, all without preparing ahead of time to do so. This is why XFS might be a great candidate for an SSD. Page 2 of 2. XFS is better larger files and long-term maintaince and stability. In this tutorial, we will check Btrfs against Ext4 filesystem, and seek to understand their functionalities, strengths, and weaknesses. btrfs 可以支援 snapshot, 但 ext4 不行, 如果一開始就採用 ext4, 日後如果要使用 snapshot 功能, 必須將 NAS 的資料備份出來, 重新 format 成 btrfs 格式. Never use ReiserFS on a new system and if you are currently using it, consider converting it to XFS or Btrfs. In most cases that’s EXT4, but for Fedora, OpenSuse and maybe a few others it’s btrfs. all kinds for nice features (like extents, subsecond timestamps) which ext3 does not have. BTRFS VS EXT4 performance in Raid 1. Mar 14, 2012. I don't know anything about XFS (I thought unRaid was entirely btrfs before this thread) ZFS is pretty reliable and very mature. 0 SSD testing ran into a strange performance drop while Btrfs. ) and if/how to preallocate metadata etc. ZFS is an advanced filesystem and many of its features focus mainly on reliability. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. Written by Michael Larabel in Storage on 20 January 2018. BTRFS was clearly in the lead when considering Documents – even better than ZFS with deduplication. but for the shared servers with many users you might consider xfs for the parallel IO and number of files. With Btrfs you get self healing, snapshots, copy on write, background file system checks, online defragmentation, and much more. Btrfs and Ext4 are Linux file systems but are. Compared to ext4, XFS has unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (if you need it) and, in recent version, reflink support (but they need to be explicitly enabled in. kernel. The Ext4 file system is a very old file system and it has been used on the Linux operating system for a long, long time. 불가능. 1. Nowadays btrfs is very stable and the tools to recover from fs corruption have been getting much better as well. 挂载 btrfs 文件系统 6. Ext4 and XFS are both great for "I need a filesystem, to store files, on this drive". If you have a NAS or Home server, BTRFS or XFS can offer benefits but then you'll have to do some extensive reading first. A continuación, os vamos a explicar brevemente las principales características de EXT4 y de Btrfs. The chart below displays the difference in terms of hard drive space reserved for redundancy. So I moved everything off of it and formatted it into XFS and ate the 0,5% space loss for peace of mind. And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. 7 - Btrfs vs. I did this to all of my partitions, including home. For example it's xfsdump/xfsrestore for xfs, dump/restore for ext2/3/4. XFS vs. 7 - Btrfs vs. Personal data is irreplaceable. Dropping performance in case with 4 threads for ext4 is a signal that there still are contention issues. Seeking around those files which a DB will do may yield different. The 3TB HDD are ext4. Tuy nhiên, đối với phân vùng /home chứa các file cá nhân, openSUSE đã quyết định sử dụng hệ thống file XFS thay thế. I'ved tested compress=off/lz4, dedup=on/off and serveral Cache/Log constellations on 256GB SSD. Như vậy, chúng ta có thể dễ dàng kết hợp các phân vùng định dạng Ext2, Ext3 và Ext4 trong cùng 1 ổ đĩa trong Ubuntu để tăng hiệu suất hoạt động. ext4 4 threads: 74 MiB/sec. A maximum. Both. XFS scales much better on modern multi-threaded workloads. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. XFS and ext4 aren't that different. For btrfs you have to do most from CLI. Như vậy, chúng ta có thể dễ dàng kết hợp các phân vùng định dạng Ext2, Ext3 và Ext4 trong cùng 1 ổ đĩa trong Ubuntu để tăng hiệu suất hoạt động. The major difference between ext4 and XFS file systems is that the ext4 file system works better for fewer size files (single write/read thread) while the XFS works more efficiently for larger files (multiple read/write threads). As for filesystems, not sure I'd bother considering JFS since I believe it may be deprecated out of the kernel soon. Linux 5. I think in many ways btrfs is the better filesystem, but I seem to have noticed that it takes longer to copy data than on ext4. It lived enough, time to move on. BTRFS bietet, mal abgesehen von der Möglichkeit einer Inline Deduplizierung, beinahe alle Features von ZFS. It uses a default file system for Linux distribution, including Debian and Ubuntu. Ext4 tiene el registro en diario de forma predeterminada y es probable que los nuevos usuarios no sepan cómo deshabilitarlo para guardar lecturas / escrituras en sus. 1. というのをベースにするとXFSが良い。 一般的にlinuxのブロックサイズは4kなので、xfsのほうが良さそう。 MySQLでページサイズ大きめならext4でもよい。xfsだとブロックサイズが大きくなるにつれて遅くなってる傾向が見える。 Ext4 is the default file system on most Linux distributions for a reason. exFAT is the best choice at the moment. BTRFS. Btrfs（技术预览） Expand section "6. You will see the difference especially with autosaves in Satisfactory for an example. (2013) compared the performance of Btrfs against XFS and ext4. This article provides a detailed comparison of the three file systems to help you decide which one is the best for your needs. There are results for “single file” with O_DIRECT case (sysbench fileio 16 KiB blocksize random write workload): ext4 1 thread: 87 MiB/sec. BtrFS is still very experimental and is not recommended for a production server or desktop environment. To reserve an external journal with a specified size when you create an XFS file system, specify the -l logdev=device,size=size option to the mkfs. And ext3. As the load increased, both of the filesystems were limited by the throughput of the underlying hardware, but XFS still maintained its lead. If you're on HDD and you need the ability to shrink the fs, then use EXT4, but you lose any COW benefits. •. 5. EXT4 had the best speed at 58MB/s while Btrfs came in slightly behind that at 52MB/s and then ZFS came in at 46MB/s. No compression, but compaction. XFS does not require extensive reading. Starting with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Ext4: cũng giống như Ext3, lưu giữ được những ưu điểm và tính tương thích ngược với phiên bản trước đó. Resizing (growing) is possible with btrfs and xfs. However benchmarks test quite narrow parameters which may not be reflected by running an OS. ZFS isn't native to Linux, nor is it GPL compatible, but it works fairly well and is a stable file system. Language: Format: Red Hat Training. The only benefit of btrfs that I could find was marginally easier setup and the software license. In this test, Btrfs outperformed LVM in every benchmark. On the other hand, for Linux/Unix-based devices, it might be a bit of a challenge choosing one among many options. Agree, actually I have a bunch of freebsd for ZFS. Overall, except for application launch time, benchmark results show that ZFS is the slowest file system in terms of read and write speed due to its COW operating type, while EXT4 is usually the fastest system. For example, xfs cannot shrink. 0 File-System. ext4 can claim historical stability, while the consumer advantage of btrfs is snapshots (the ease of. Ext4 is the default system for most Distros. However, when we review EXT4 vs BTRFS, here’s the downside: BTRFS has disk and volume management built-in, while EXT4 is a “pure filesystem”. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. Btrfs is slower, especially on non-SSDs, because of CoW, but has a whole lot more going on under the hood in way of features and data integrity. Windows has always been terribly slow to update, say, all file permissions in a large directory structure. Unix, etc. Ext2 → Ext3 → Ext4. could go with btrfs even though it's still in beta and not recommended for production yet. For example it's xfsdump/xfsrestore for xfs, dump/restore for ext2/3/4. 14 stable and Linux 3. The benchmark results of three most common file systems under Linux environment were given in this paper. The way you describe this workload, I think it is not very demanding. F2FS With Linux 4. It you have huge hard drives, BTRFS supports up to 16 times larger size than 1 EXT4 partition. You can see several XFS vs ext4 benchmarks on phoronix. Die Funktionen umfassen eine transparente Komprimierung, Prüfsummen und. It takes a second to snapshot, and deletes of a snapshotted tree what takes ext4 26 hours is a few minutes on btrfs. On the other hand, backup of xfs to xfs allows you certain features that. 1 million iops for ext4, right in line with the spec of the drive times 2,. Btrfs removes duplicate data from disk directly while Ext4 cannot do that, Btrfs support CoW so users can create writable and read-only. The SATA 3. The benchmark I linked attributes this to copy-on-write behaviour of btrfs. The file system has been a solid choice for file servers and data centers since its introduction. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. When running PostMark, ZFS came out far ahead of the UFS file-systems being more than ten times faster than. XFS与Ext4性能比较. Back when Bcachefs debuted in 2015 I ran some initial. I have 6 disks so I have created 3 logical disks, 2 SSDs each - just for testing. Each of these file systems has its own way of. Ext4 provides more flexibility in terms of data storage. Note that while these tests are not indicative of real-world performance, we can extrapolate these results and use this as one reason. . 4 EXT4 / XFS / Btrfs RAID Performance On Four HDDs Storage : 2019-12-28: Benchmarking The Experimental Bcachefs File-System Against Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS & ZFS Storage : 2019-06-25: Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: Linux 5. Файловая система Ext4 это улучшенная версия Ext3, которая, в свою очередь, не что иное, как переработанная Ext2. btrfs has the "btrfs-balance" command. for the home lab you can use ext4 it is fast an flexible: grow and shrink are supported. for data security and integrity zfs is the best. But unless you intend to use these features, and know how to use them, they are useless. ext4 is not recommended. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. Btrfs vs. ago. 0 Intel Skylake 16384MB Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB LLVMpipe Realtek ALC1150 Intel Connection Ubuntu 16. 6. 另外，我们常说的file对象，它用于关联进程和dentry对象的. But not enough users follow the guide on and instead do stuff that actually makes the system worse. Btrfs 與 EXT4 常見問題解答. And you might just as well use EXT4. 4 was performing the best for RAID0 and RAID10 modes while with RAID1, XFS was performing the best. For these reasons, Fedora has made BTRFS the standard filesystem in their newer releases. Quota journaling: This avoids the need for lengthy quota consistency checks after a crash. Its OS comes with only one by default (mostly it’s NTFS, FAT 32, or HFS). A Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe 4. e. I use ext4 everywhere. Data integrity protection. Tbh, it depends on game by game basis Team Fortress 2 will go as low as nearly 50%, same for KSP. 7 - EXT4 vs. Checksum: if your file (or some metadata) gets corrupted, the checksum will detect and in some case. This is the first time that the new EXT4 and Btrfs and NILFS2 filesystems have been directly compared when it comes to their disk performance though the results may surprise. Each of these file systems has its own way of organizing data, merits, and demerits. Compared to Ext4, XFS has a relatively poor performance for single threaded, metadata-intensive workloads. I am getting too many input/output errors with my 3TB HDD NTFS hard disk for main files. Although Btrfs lacks stability and maturity as of this writing, it is more feature-rich than EXT4 despite this. We recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments. It does its job well. A daily snapshot of Ubuntu 19. as @Neoon pointed out ext4 (on your mdraid) works just fine, for that you can rather discuss the usage of raw vs qemu, which driver (virtio, scsi,. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. I understand that btrfs have a major problem with Raid, - and that is a problem. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA. 但无论如何，各个文件系统都需要存储这三类信息，因为这是内核规定的（见下）。. The four hard drives used for testing were 6TB Seagate IronWolf NAS (ST6000VN0033. It is destined to be replaced by Btrfs as the default Linux filesystem. removes the need for LVM and thus eliminates 1 layer for filesystem-ing (if that’s a word) On top of that, in 2008, the principal developer of EXT3 and. Ext4 - очень стабильная файловая система, которая была выбрана по. 84 nvme drives split up into a small ext4 volume and the rest is btrfs. EDIT 1: Added that BTRFS is the default filesystem for Red Hat but only on Fedora. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. However ZFS does come at one major downside, it needs more resources in just about every way one can imagine, ZFS is best with more disks, more RAM, more CPU, more Bandwidth, more SSD’s for caching…. The benchmark I linked attributes this to copy-on-write behaviour of btrfs. In some areas Btrfs was showing great improvements in performance, especially for the RAID setup, but it still lacked in some other areas. Ext4中没有这种内置的压缩支持。 Btrfs直接从磁盘删除重复数据，而Ext4不能这样做， Btrfs支持. , power failure) could be acceptable. 7. Snapraid says if the disk size is below 16TB there are no limitations, if above 16TB the parity drive has to be XFS because the parity is a single file and EXT4 has a file size limit of 16TB. Key Btrfs features Perhaps the most important feature is the checksumming of all data. Phoronix: Linux 4. 1. 0 as well as with the help of stock mount options. If you're looking to warehouse big blobs of data or lots of archive and reporting; then by all means ZFS is a great choice. 0-040700-generic (x86_64) Unity 7. It's not the fastest but not exactly a slouch. But I was more talking to the XFS vs EXT4 comparison. All my systems (4) have been using BTRFS for some time now without any issues. Small_Light_9964 • 1 yr. EXT4 vs. From some of the recent Linux kernel patches, it seems some of the most popular Linux file systems, Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS), B-Tree Filesystem (Btrfs), and fourth extended filesystem. , power failure) could be acceptable. As a reminder, luks encrypted partition are not dependent on the used file system (ext3/ext4/etc. All of these Linux. ext4 (RHEL 7. Hey Guys! Welcome to XPSTECH. Also, server raid originally md raid5 (4x4TB NAS drives) with XFS had taken all day to build, but creating btrfs-raid10 was seconds. I remember being on ext4 using Timeshift but it only supports rsync–so slow. Two subvolumes, root and home, are created from that pool and mounted at / and /home respectively. In terms of XFS vs Ext4, XFS is superior to Ext4 in the following. Also, on ZFS, in Linux, it takes some tweaking to get it performing good, so I would suggest to go btrfs or XFS. But according to tests in all scenarios, XFS is better than EXT4, it's a pity that there are no tests in games. Reliable! I used it in Rsync mode as only my backup disk is btrfs, everything else was ext4 or XFS. Journaling ensures file system integrity after system crashes (for example, due to power outages) by keeping a record of file system. F2FS, XFS, ext4, zfs, btrfs, ntfs, etc. - Linux Kernel 5. BTRFS have some fancy features, and could help you manage your disk better in some automation-future-proof way. If you wish to run ext4, xfs or btrfs then you need to run a linux OS not BSD. Improve this answer. org Phoronix Test Suite Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4. If you do hardware RAID, with a dedicated RAID card, just do not use ZFS please, it will break your data at some point. Otherwise, I don't think you'd notice the performance difference. EXT4. Theodore Ts’o, a maintainer for Ext3 and later, Ext4, has stated that he sees Btrfs as a better way forward than continuing to rely on the ext* technology. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. OMV supports btrfs but you still have to scrub etc yourself from the command line. Checksumming, along with copy-on-write, provides the key method of ensuring file system integrity after unexpected power loss. because it spans multiple partitions, it's less likely to fill up your hard drive. Another way to characterize this is that the Ext4 file system variants tend to perform better on systems that have limited I/O capability. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux. (當然另一種做法是新增硬碟, 另外格式化為 btrfs. 2. mount the recently formatted btrfs partition without special options just with mount /dev/nvme0n1p2 /mnt and create the subvolumes you want, e. Ext4 is a journaled filesystem, which simply means that it “journals” the location of the files on the disk and keeps track of the changes on the disk. Bảo vệ dữ liệu. 4. Potential for data loss: While btrfs has features to protect against data loss, these features can be complex to configure and may not always work as intended, leading to the possibility of data loss. It's a filesystem which resides entirely in your RAM. From some of the recent Linux kernel patches, it seems some of the most popular Linux file systems, Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS), B-Tree Filesystem (Btrfs), and fourth extended filesystem. ext4 was supposed to be a stop gap until a better Linux filesystem came along. ZFS likes eating RAM. Januar 2020. The ext4 file system is still fully supported in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and can be selected at installation. Not just permissions, but moving them or getting file sizes, too. The most commonly used are Ext4, Btrfs, XFS, and ZFS which is the most recent file system released back in 2018. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. Four years later, Rodeh et al. Linux File System Comparison: XFS vs. Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. Ext3 should be out, too, since it's been replaced by ext4. 1. Ext4, Btrfs, and XFS are three widely used file systems in Linux. Tính năng sao chép dữ liệu. Btrfs vs Ext4. XFS is a robust and mature 64-bit journaling file system that supports very large files and file systems on a single host. I know how to maintain it even in case of horrible events. 0 mainline kernel and using the stock mount options. For a consumer it depends a little on what your expectations are. For more than 3 disks, or a spinning disk with ssd, zfs starts to look very interesting. • 3 mo. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. Yves Trudeau. Precisely, it seems to be 50%. Installing and booting with BTRFS has its advantages too. That's right, XFS "repairs" errors on the fly, whereas ext4 requires you to remount read-only and fsck. /boot/efi has to be FAT32 (assuming you are using it as the ESP and not just adding partitions extra partitions under /boot to test how robust the boot sequence is). EXT4, Btrfs, and XFS were tested on the Ubuntu mainline kernel PPA hosted Linux 3. Pro: supported by all distro's, commercial and not, and based on ext3, so it's widely tested, stable and proven. Those curious about the many changes found for the file-systems and other sub-systems within the Linux 3. Same as with ZFS. Worthy mentions on the functionality front include: Copy-on-write: Btrfs uses copy-on-write to create system snapshots without duplicating data and wasting space. 04 Disco Dingo was running on the Threadripper setup while using the Linux Git kernel from the mainline PPA. XFS 和 ext4 的比较. Ext3 and Ext4 perform better on limited bandwidth (< 200MB/s) and up to ~1,000 IOPS capability. BTRFS is newer, and the performance is not as good in many cases, but it is not far off. Btrfs on SSD, XFS on HDD. 再將資料再回存到 NAS, 這部份會花費很多時間. Btrfs has been a stable part of the Linux kernel since 2013, and you can reformat your hard drives using the file system today. EXT4 es el sistema de archivos más utilizado en sistemas operativos basados en Linux, este sistema de. Compression is usually not very efficient on game data (that is already compressed) and can increase fragmentation. Btrfs is the recommended file system to use in most scenarios. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. . X percent… The more modern filesystems of BTRFS and ZFS not only have data integrity features but also the inline compression pushes the efficiency past 100% in many cases. If it is only about reliability and you're in doubt, go with ext4, imho. Because of that, the Ext4 file system is very stable. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe. So for a large video collection, I think I will stick with ext4 still. Interestingly, the first version of the Ext4 filesystem, the Extended filesystem (“Ext”), came out in 1992 for the Minix OS. Btrfs was developed specifically to facilitate quick administration and maintenance. ZFS on FreeBSD may be faster than BTRFS on Linux. Using: - A full partition in a single 1TB or 2TB NVMe SSD. 14 SSD Benchmarks With Btrfs vs. EXT4 has been the Linux default since 2006, following the previous EXT3. Various benchmarks have concluded that the actual ext4 file system can perform a variety of read-write operations faster than an NTFS partition. The only time there were issues was when my RAM sticks went bad and btrfs detected it and put my FS into read-only mode to prevent corruption. 21 merge window (now known as Linux 5. Posts: 5,135. Sun Microsystems originally created it as part of its Solaris operating system. Usable space isn't a big issue but I don't want to lose half with RAID 10. Updating 1 million files takes ages. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. With btrfs I got 130-160MB. ext4 with m=0 ext4 with m=0 and T=largefile4 xfs with crc=0 mounted them with: defaults,noatime defaults,noatime,discard defaults,noatime results show really no difference between first two, while plotting 4 at a time: time is around 8-9 hours. Edit: I managed to save the two NTFS HDDs with chkdsk, but the exFAT drive just didn't wanna play ball. The checking task improved 14,6 %. We’ll go over each file system in more detail ahead. After a week of testing Btrfs on my laptop, I can conclude that there is a noticeable performance penalty vs Ext4 or XFS. May 1, 2016 at 10:46. I have 6 disks so I have created 3 logical disks, 2 SSDs each - just for testing. It's a mature filesystem and offers online defragmentation and can. EXT4 is functional and is considered more stable. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. , a really large number of processes all writing to the filesystem at once). Picking a filesystem is not really relevant on a Desktop computer. Hi there, I‘m thinking of changing my filesystem from ext4 to btrfs, as I have read a lot of positive things about it online. 3. El ext4 y xf. The Ext4 File System. It is backward-compatible with older versions of Ext. El ext4 y xf. A. ZFS brings robustness and stability, while it avoids the corruption of large files. 7. Across the three tested RAID modes, EXT4 was performing the worst. Tính năng tự khôi phục tập tin.